718
results found in
101 ms
Page 59
of 72
Resource name: /E-Library/Works of The Mother/English/CWMCE/Questions and Answers_Volume-09/precontent.htm
*
The Mother - 1958
Resource name: /E-Library/Works of The Mother/English/CWMCE/Questions and Answers_Volume-09/05 November 1958.htm
5 November 1958
“Spiritual
truth is a truth of the spirit, not a truth of
the
intellect, not a mathematical theorem or a logical
formula.
It is a truth of the Infinite, one in an infi-
nite
diversity, and it can assume an infinite variety of
aspects
and formations: in the spiritual evolution it is
inevitable
that there should be a many-sided passage
and reaching
to the one Truth, a many-sided seizing
of it;
this many-sidedness is the sign of the approach
of the soul
to a living reality, not to an abstraction or
a constructed
figure of things that can be petrified into
a dead
or stony formula. The hard logical and intel-
lectual
Resource name: /E-Library/Works of The Mother/English/CWMCE/Questions and Answers_Volume-09/06 March 1957.htm
6
March 1957
My eye won’t allow me to read today. ¹ But I have been asked a
question on what I read to you last week. I am going to reply to it this
evening. Pavitra, will you read, please?
(Pavitra reads) What does this paragraph mean?: “Free-
dom is the law of being in its illimitable unity, secret
master of all Nature: servitude is the law of love in
the being voluntarily giving itself to serve the play of
its other selves in the multiplicity.”
Thoughts and Glimpses, Cent. Vol. 16, p.
386
*
At a superficial glance these two things appear absolutely contradictory
and incompatible. Outwardly one cannot conceive how one can be at once in
Resource name: /E-Library/Works of The Mother/English/CWMCE/Questions and Answers_Volume-09/22 March 1957.htm
22 March 1957
The following story was told by Mother during
a Friday class.
This evening I am going to read to you a short story which seemed
quite instructive to me. It is a tale of ancient times, of what used to happen
before there were printing presses and books, of the days when only the Guru or
the Initiate had the knowledge and gave it only to those he considered worthy
of having it. And for him, usually, “to be worthy of having it” meant putting
into practice] what one had learnt. He gave you a truth and expected you to
practise it. And when you had put it into practice, he consented to give you
another.
Now things happen quite differently. Everybody and
Resource name: /E-Library/Works of The Mother/English/CWMCE/Questions and Answers_Volume-09/02 April 1958.htm
2 April 1958
Mother, you
said that when one consciously makes a
mistake it is
much more serious than if one makes it
unconsciously.
When you make a mistake because you don’t know that it is a
mistake, through ignorance, it is obvious that when you learn that it is a
mistake, when the ignorance has gone and you have goodwill, you don’t make the
mistake any more, and so you come out of the condition in which you could make
it. But if you know it is a mistake and make it, this means that there is
something perverse in you which has deliberately chosen to be on the side of
confusion or bad will or even the anti-divine forces.
And it is quite obvious that if one ch
Resource name: /E-Library/Works of The Mother/English/CWMCE/Questions and Answers_Volume-09/26 June 1957.htm
26 June 1957
“But there
is here still the necessity of a resort to the
normal means of propagation and
the gross method
of physical Nature. A purely occult method, a resort
to supraphysical processes acting by supraphysical
means for a physical result
would have to be possible
if we are to avoid this necessity: the resort to the
sex
impulse and its animal process could not be trans-
cended otherwise. If there
is some reality in the
phenomenon of materialisation and dematerialisation
claimed to be possible by occultists and evidenced by
occurrences many of us
have witnessed,¹ a method of
this kind would not
be out of the range of possi-
Resource name: /E-Library/Works of The Mother/English/CWMCE/Questions and Answers_Volume-09/05 March 1958.htm
5
March 1958
Mother, won’t
you please speak to us about the
“reversal”
you have already mentioned to us several
times?
You said that a reversal was necessary to
obtain the
new consciousness.
A reversal?
What kind of
reversal do we need, now? You said
“a reversal
of consciousness”.
That is a way of speaking. It doesn’t mean
that you should walk on your head!…It is an image.
Yes, Sri
Aurobindo has said this too,¹ so…
So, if the image leads you to some kind of perception, it is good,
but it is not with this (Mother points to
the head) that you can understand. If it gives you an impression which
explains things to you
Resource name: /E-Library/Works of The Mother/English/CWMCE/Questions and Answers_Volume-09/01 October 1958.htm
1 October 1958
Sweet
Mother, what is an ideal of moral perfection?
There are thousands of moral perfections. Everyone has his own
ideal of moral perfection.
What is usually called moral perfection is to have all the
qualities that are considered moral: to have no defects, never to make a
mistake, never to err, to be always what one conceives to be the best, to have
all the virtues – that is, to realise the highest mental conception: to take
all the qualities – there are many, aren’t there? – all the virtues, all that
man has conceived to be the most beautiful, most noble, most true, and to live
that integrally, to let all one’s actions be guided by that, all the movem
Resource name: /E-Library/Works of The Mother/English/CWMCE/Questions and Answers_Volume-09/05 February 1958.htm
5
February 1958
“The
metaphysical objection [to a teleological cosmos]
is more serious; for it seems
self-evident that the Abso-
lute can have no purpose in manifestation except the
delight
of manifestation itself: an evolutionary move-
ment in Matter as part of the
manifestation must fall
within this universal statement; it can be there only
for
the delight of the unfolding, the progressive execution,
the objectless seried self-revelation. A universal total-
ity may also be considered as
something complete in
itself; as a totality, it has nothing to gain or to add
to
its fullness of being. But here the material world is not
an integra
Resource name: /E-Library/Works of The Mother/English/CWMCE/Questions and Answers_Volume-09/13 November 1957.htm
13
November 1957
I have a
question about the first page where Sri
Aurobindo
says, “A spiritual evolution, an evolution
of
consciousness in Matter in a constant developing
self-formation
till the form can reveal the indwelling
Spirit, is
then the key-note, the central significant
motive
of the terrestrial existence.”
The Life Divine, p. 824
*
So, from the
point of view of form, in what way is
man superior
to other animals?
I think this is quite easy to find.
Sri Aurobindo speaks of the form that is capable of manifesting
the Spirit. The very nature of the manifestation of the Spirit is
consciousness, understanding