SEVENTH DAY’S PROCEEDINGS   Mr. Das continuing his speech said that on Saturday he was dealing with the evidence of Narendra Nath Mullick and their Lordships would remember that with reference to the cross-examination of the garden watch witnesses he mentioned three dates, namely, 17th , 24th and 25th . With regard to the first two days he stated that Sarat Chandra Palit was with him in Dooni Lal Seal’s garden, but Sarat Chandra Palit did not support him. On the 25th , Narendra said, Chandi Charan was with him, but the latter did not mention anything about it. With regard to No. 4, Harrison Road counsel had pointed out to their lordships that Na

Tenth Day's Proceedings TENTH DAY’S PROCEEDINGS       His Lordship resumed the further hearing of the reference in the Alipore Bomb Case.      The Advocate-General, continuing his argument in the case against the Sen Brothers, referred to a letter written by Hem Chandra Sen, the elder brother, to Susil and Biren, the appellants. This letter was found in the possession of Susil at Sylhet. On the envelop was the address, 128-1, Keranibagan Road and dated April 1908. This letter gave colour to the fact that Biren was Page 409 going to Japan. The letter showed that Susil, a boy of 16 years of age, had left school and had no occupation.

-49_Thirthieth Day^s Proceedings.htm THIRTIETH DAY’S PROCEEDINGS Mr. Norton continuing his address said that amongst other things there was found a notebook containing some items of expenditure under the heading of "marriage expenditure" Counsel submitted that "marriage expenditure" referred to bomb making. The Chief Justice: I think this is the book as to which criticism was made that it was not discovered until the third search ? Mr. Norton: My explanation is this. The object which the police had in their mind was to discover materials in connection with the bombs, arms and ammunitions and so on. It did not occur to them that these books were of any value until they got inst

SIXTEENTH DAY'S PROCEEDINGS   Mr. Das continuing his address said that when the Court rose on Wednesday he was placing the judgment with regard to Sishir Kumar Ghosh before their Lordships.      Counsel read the portion of the judgment relating to Sishir and submitted, it would have been a very different judgment had not the Sessions Judge considered the judgment in the Jamalpur , case and had he not taken it as a fact that Sishir was connected with the Yugantar. Both these pieces of evidence, Counsel Page 254 submitted, were not evidence in the case. Where there was any evidence dealing with the case of the other persons

-31_Twelfth Day^s Proceedings.htm TWELFTH DAY’S PROCEEDINGS Mr. Das continuing his address dealt with the charge under section 121A of the Indian Penal Code and submitted that a conspiracy meant a particular intent and combination or in other words an intent and agreement between the different persons charged. His authority for that contention was to be found in Roscoe’s Book on Criminal Law, 12th edition, page 367. After reading an extract from the book in question Mr. Das said the first question was this : Unless the prosecution could prove that all the persons charged were parties to that agreement the offence was not made out. The essence of the offence was the object with which

ARGUMENT Mr. C R Das Barrister On the 4th March 1909 the Crown counsel Closed the evidence. The accused were then examined by the Judge to explain the evidence against them. Almost all the accused declined to answer the questions put to them and contented themselves y merelystating that the lawyers on their behalf had their full instructions to argue and explain the evidence. Mr. Norton then began his argument which he finished on the 20th March. The various defence counsel and pleaders then addressed the Court― Mr. C. R Das for Aravinda taking eight days. Their arguments occupied the Court till the 13th April. As bot

SEVENTEENTH DAY’S PROCEEDINGS   Mr. Das continuing his address said that when the Court rose on Thursday, he was dealing with the case of Abinash Chunder Bhattacharjee and was referring to the two books "Mukti Kon Pathe " and " The modern Art of War," which, according to the case for the prosecution, Abinash published.      It would be more convenient if he gave their Lordships all the points there were in the evidence as regards the connection of Abinash with the Jugantar. That evidence began with the evidence of Purina Chunder Lahiri when he said that soon after the — Jugantar was started in June 1906, he went to make enquiries at 27, Kan

-40_Twenty First Day^s Proceedings.htm TWENTY-FIRST DAYS PROCEEDINGS Mr. Das continuing his address said that when the Court rose on Tuesday he was dealing with the case of Balkrishna Hari Kane and Page 268 had shown to their Lordships that if they considered the circumstances they would End that on the day, the witnesses said they made their journey from Howrah to Nagpur, the journey was impossible. Counsel had pointed out that the prosecution did not take any steps at all till the 1Sth or rather the 19th May. This was extraordinary. Counsel had already submitted before their Lordships the evidence of Balai Ganguli, in which he said that he was deputed and he started from Calc

The Alipore Bomb Trial   By Bijoy Krishna Bose.     Pre-content   Forward   Preface   A Short History Of The Case   Leading Dates   The Preliminary Enquiry   First Information Report   Sanction   Statement of Accused Pe

Distinguishing mark or number Description of Articles Date of Admission Whether admitted after or without objection. REMARKS 810 Counterfoils of Ex. 805-806 17th June 1908 Without.   811 Counterfoils of Ex. 805-806 Ditto Ditto 812 Document Ditto Ditto Produced by P. W. 57 813 Record of land acquisition case of 41, Champatala lane containing Ex. 807 1 and 2. 22nd June 1908 Ditto   814 Copy of notice