FIRST  DAY Mr. Justice Carnduff, I.C.S APPEAL BEFORE THE HIGH COURT.        On the 25th May, 1909, Barindra K. Ghose and Ullaskar Dutt filed an appeal before the Criminal Bench of the High Court presided over by Justices C. P. Casperz and A. E. Ryves against their convictions and sentence. The same was admitted. On the same day Asoke Chundra Nundy and Indra Nath Nundy filed separate appeals and 15 other accused persons tiled another appeal jointly. All were admitted and usual notices

Distinguishing mark or number Description of Articles Date of Admission Whether admitted after or without objection. REMARKS 972 pieces of iron 20fh july 1908 Without   973 pieces of iron Ditto Ditto 974 Brass lid of au Engine oil-box Ditto Ditto 975 A piece of lead pipe Ditto Ditto 976 Postal parcel receipts Ditto Ditto P W No. 179 977 Chalan received wit

Fourth Day's Proceedings FOURTH DAY’S PROCEEDINGS        The further hearing of the Reference in the Alipore Bomb case was resumed to-day.      Mr. B. Chuckraverty, who appeared with Babus Dasarathi Sanyal and Debendra Chandra Bhattacharjee, on behalf of Indra Nath Nandy, addressing the Court said that his client was convicted by the Sessions Judge in disagreement with the Assessors, under Sections 121, 121 (A) and 122 of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to transportation for life. The Assessors were for acquitting Indra Nath. The case for the Crown in connection Page 403 with this appellant rested mainly on the evidence of two

TWENTY-FIRST DAYS PROCEEDINGS   Mr. Das continuing his address said that when the Court rose on Tuesday he was dealing with the case of Balkrishna Hari Kane and Page 268 had shown to their Lordships that if they considered the circumstances they would End that on the day, the witnesses said they made their journey from Howrah to Nagpur, the journey was impossible. Counsel had pointed out that the prosecution did not take any steps at all till the 1Sth or rather the 19th May. This was extraordinary. Counsel had already submitted before their Lordships the evidence of Balai Ganguli, in which he said that he was

Twenty - Second Day's Proceedings THIRTY-SECOND DAY’S PROCEEDINGS         Mr. Norton continuing his address took up the case of Hrishi Kesh. On the 11th May Rishikesh made a confessional statement and was also implicated by the confessional statements of Barindra Kumar Ghosh and Ulhskar Dutt.      Mr. Norton then referred to the various documents, which, the prosecution alleged, showed Rishikesh connection with the conspiracy. Judging from his confession Rishikesh’s vindictiveness against British Rule would probably tempt him to in as man men as he could. The phrase "preaching the new cult" which occurred in one of the documents, said Counsel, could not

-41_Twenty Second Day^s Proceedings.htm TWENTY-SECOND DAY’S PROCEEDINGS Mr. Chakraverti continuing his address on behalf of Indra Nath Nandi said that the evidence against his client beyond what he stated to their Lordships on Wednesday consisted of certain documents found at searches made in the garden, 15 Gopi Mohan Dutt’s Lane and one other lace in Bhowanipur. The last item was evidence——if it was evidence at all—·of Indra Nath's connection at Jamalpur when he was simply bound down under section 107 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Counsel would take the search at the garden as the most important item of evidence to which he desired to draw their Lordships` attention. There were f

DECLARATION OF PRESSES Press Owner Where Date of Declaration Papers printed according to declaration of papers Keshub Printing Works Keshub Ch. Sen Gupta 7, Santiram Ghose's Lane 25.3.1904 Sandhya till 9-7-1907 Bande Mataram, 21-8-1906 22-10-1906 Saraswati Press (Name changed to Sihna Press) kanak Ch. Nan Nikunja Lall Dutt Satish Ch.Dass Surendra Nath Sinha 193, Cornwallis Street Ditto Ditto 23, Sib Narain Dass' Lane 24-11-1905 16-11-1906 14-5-1907 6

-21_Second Day^s Hearing.htm SECOND DAY’S HEARING Mr. C. R. Das continuing his address said that when the Court rose on Monday he was dealing with the point of jurisdiction. Before he left the point of the want of jurisdiction generally as apart from the particular charge, he desired to point out the evidence of certain witnesses with reference to what transpired before Mr. Thornhill. The first witness was Inspector Purna Chandra Biswas who said that the complaint was written by the Commissioner of Police and presented by him to Mr. Thornhill. It was against Arabinda's "gang of outlaws." He produced 7 men before Mr. Thornhill on the 5th May and they were sent to Alipore. Therefore what

TWELFTH DAY’S PROCEEDINGS   Mr. Das continuing his address dealt with the charge under section 121A of the Indian Penal Code and submitted that a conspiracy meant a particular intent and combination or in other words an intent and agreement between the different persons charged. His authority for that contention was to be found in Roscoe’s Book on Criminal Law, 12th edition, page 367.      After reading an extract from the book in question Mr. Das said the first question was this : Unless the prosecution could prove that all the persons charged were parties to that agreement the offence was not made out. The essence of the offence was t

-55_Thirty Sixth Day^s Proceedings.htm THIRTY-SIXTH DAY’S PROCEEDINGS Mr. Norton continuing his address on behalf of the Crown referred to the evidence of the shadowing witnesses against Sailendra and said that there was no doubt that Sailendra was Mr. Norton then dealt with the case against Balkrishna Hari Kane. The evidence against him was documentary and the central pivot of the case for the prosecution against this man was that his name was mentioned by Barin. Kane had all along been alluded to as the Madrasi and his name was not known until the 3rd or 4th of May when Barin made a statement `to the police. The Chief Justice : How can a statement made by Barin to the police