932
results found in
20 ms
Page 40
of 94
I wanted to mention something (I couldn't tell you about it
lasttime), but I have been solicited by Paolo, [[An Italian
film maker, architect and painter. ]] who is preparing a
documentary on the Ashram for television. He asked to take
photos of me, a film, and so on. First I said, "I'll talk about it
with Mother." But as it wasn't possible lately, yesterday he
finally
came down on me with his camera, and I let him.
He's nice, Paolo, very nice!
Yes, but still, showing myself off ...
Oh, mon petit, and what about me!
Ah, but with you it's different!
Excuse me! It's still worse! (Mother laugh
Resource name: /E-Library/Disciples/Varun Pabrai/English/Agenda Quick Reference/I gave Sri Aurobindo the key.htm
In the universe there is an inexhaustible source of energy that asks only to
be replenished; if you know how to go about it, it is replenished. Instead of draining life and the energies of our earth and
making of it something parched and inert, we must know the practical exercise
for replenishing the energy constantly. And these are not just words; I know how
it's to be done, and science is in the process of thoroughly finding out - it
has found out most admirably. But instead of using it to satisfy human passions,
instead of using what science has found so that men may destroy each other more
effectively than they are presently doing, it must be used to enrich the ear
Resource name: /E-Library/Disciples/Varun Pabrai/English/Agenda Quick Reference/Mritunjay's sister.htm
-649_Mritunjay's sister.html
Not long ago M.'s sister died (psychologically, she was in a terrible
state - she had no faith). Well, on that day, [[May 17, 1959. ]] just
when I came to know that she was passing away, I remember being upstairs
in the bathroom communicating with Sri Aurobindo, having a sort of
conversation with him (it happens very often), and I asked him, 'What
happens to such people when they die here at the Ashram?' 'Look,' he
replied, and I saw her passing away; and on her forehead, I saw Sri
Aurobindo's symbol in a SOLID golden light (not very luminous, but very
concrete). There it was. And with the presence of this sign the psychological state no longer mattered
... I saw S.G. this morning, the person who went to America, who knew
Kennedy and even spoke to him about the possibility of openly joining
with Russia so as to exert pressure on the world and prevent armed
disputes (he said, "to settle all border and territorial disputes in a
peaceful way," beginning, of course, with China and India). Kennedy had
been enthusiastic. The Russian ambassador had been summoned at once, and
he had telephoned Khrushchev: enthusiastic over the idea (but this
Khrushchev seems to be rather a good man). They were supposed to sort it
out during a meeting at the U.N. At this point, Kennedy makes
off....[[Kennedy was assassinated on November
That was the idea: for a few beings to first attain, here in this
physical world, a level of realization giving them the power to
materialize a supramental being.
I once told you I put a body on a vital being[[. This story is
also part of the lost treasures of 1957 or 1958. ]] - but I couldn't
have made that body material; it would have been impossible: something
is lacking. Something is lacking. Even if it were made visible, it would
probably not be possible to make it permanent - at the slightest
opportunity, it would dematerialize. What we can't get is that
permanence.
It's something Sri Aurobindo and I have discussed ("discussed
Generally, fish in the sea mean Multitude.[[. In a personal context
such as this dream, fish, according to Sri Aurobindo, symbolize the
"vital mind" in constant movement, making all sorts of formations. ]]
But there must be many meanings; I have told you that Buddhism often
uses the image of fish as a symbol.
Symbolisms, mon petit, there are hundreds and hundreds of them.
And people always oppose them, but ultimately they are just different
ways of seeing one and the same thing. According to my experience,
everyone has his own symbolism.
page 124 - Mother's Agenda , volume 6, 14th June - 1965
So far, the meditations with X are much better than last time. Today especially it was very good.
It's a contemplation going right up to the Supreme, with a
constant, continuous Descent: something which doesn't waver the whole
time ('doesn't waver' - I mean doesn't vary), during the whole
meditation. But if I ask him what happened, he'll tell me a little
story!
Yesterday I saw N. and he told me, 'Oh! X had an experience
during the meditation with you this morning.' 'Ah!' I said to myself,
'This is going to be interesting.' (I was wrong to think so, by the way,
even for a quarter of a second.) 'Yes,' he told me, 'he saw what seemed
t
Yet, by analogy (it's not an analogy, it's a correspondence), I can
tell it has to do with what we call "this one" or "that one," this or
that other person. Last night, for instance, I spent a long time with
M. and G. who were frantically calling me (they left from here and have
reached England), I spent a long time with them, but they were no
longer "persons," the puppets we are, it wasn't that! Yet it was them.
The contact was very accurate, very precise, the vibratory qualities
were very clear. And there were forms: forms can be seen, but it no
longer has the same quality. There's something hard, opaque and clumsy
that disappears.
It's the same thing in the tra